📓 Homework: JavaScript Exception Handling with try...catch
In this lesson, we're going to familiarize ourselves with a JavaScript exception handling tool called try...catch
. This tool can be used for any JavaScript, as well as code that makes API calls. In a future lesson, we'll use a try...catch
with an API call, but in this lesson, we'll use it with regular, synchronous JavaScript. So, take the opportunity to absorb the concepts covered here with the understanding that they will be incorporated later in this section.
Error Handling with try...catch
In an ideal world, all our code would function perfectly and never have errors. But in the real world, errors are inevitable. By this point, you've learned how to debug applications with breakpoints and the DevTools console. You've also learned to lint and to continuously test your code with Jest. Let's take this knowledge one step further and learn about exception handling.
First, what is an exception? An exception is an unusual problem that arises in your code. An exception should be just that: exceptional. What does "exceptional" mean? Exceptions should handle unexpected errors in our code, not anticipated errors. When a user enters their password incorrectly, that's an anticipated error. Users often make mistakes, so we shouldn't throw exceptions when they do.
However, let's say we have a complex application that handles credit card payments. What would happen if we had a payBalance()
function that accidentally charged our customers twice? That would be a serious and unexpected error.
Similarly, when we make an API call, we expect to get a 200 OK
as a response. However, if we were to get a 400
or 500
level status code (error codes), that would be an exceptional error.
Programmers use exception handling to deal with serious and unexpected anomalies in their code. Exception handling is a feature of programming languages in general, not just JavaScript.
In JavaScript, we can handle an exception with a try...catch
block, which looks like this:
try {
// Code to try goes here.
} catch {
// Handle or log any raised errors.
}
We can wrap any code inside the try
block. Then, if that code has errors, control will shift to the catch
block, where we can write code to handle these errors.
What do we mean by control? Well, control flow is a term used to explain the order a sequence of code will be evaluated. Conditionals change the flow of control in a block of code depending on whether the conditional evaluates to true or false. Likewise, a try...catch
block can change control flow if an error is thrown, moving the control into the catch
block.
We can't use a try
block by itself; doing so will throw an error. try
blocks must always be accompanied by either catch
, finally
, or both. We won't cover finally
in depth, other than the fact that a finally
block always runs regardless of whether the try
block has errors that are caught. finally
blocks are often used for cleanup or freeing up resources.
A Demonstration
Let's create a very basic application to demonstrate how to use try...catch
blocks. The application asks a user to input a number. If the number is negative, the application will throw and catch an error.
Before we start, it's important to note that this is not a situation where we'd use exception handling. After all, we expect users to make mistakes. However, we can use this example to show how exception handling works.
The root directory of our application will have two files: try.html
and try.js
. Note that we aren't using a development environment for this example — we don't need webpack to demonstrate how try...catch
blocks work. We will add try...catch
blocks in a development environment in a future lesson.
Here's the HTML:
<html lang="en-US">
<head>
<script type="text/javascript" src="try.js"></script>
<title>Enter a positive number</title>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<h1>Please enter a whole number above 0</h1>
<form>
<label for="number">Enter your number:</label>
<input id="number" name="number" type="text">
<button type="submit" id="submittedNumber">Is your number valid?</button>
</form>
<div id="displayNumber"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Now let's take a look at the JavaScript code:
// User Interface Logic
function checkNumber(number) {
if (isNaN(number) || number < 0) {
throw "Not a valid number!";
} else {
document.querySelector('#displayNumber').innerText = "This number is valid. You may continue.";
}
}
window.addEventListener("load", function() {
document.querySelector('#submittedNumber').addEventListener("submit", function(event) {
event.preventDefault();
const inputtedNumber = parseInt(document.querySelector('#number').value);
document.querySelector('#number').value = null;
try {
checkNumber(inputtedNumber);
} catch(error) {
console.error(`Red alert! We have an error: ${error.message}`);
}
});
});
We'll skip the familiar event handling code and jump right into the new concepts. First, we have a checkNumber()
function which will check to see if the number is NaN
or below 0. If it is, it will throw
an exception. Here's ours:
if (isNaN(number) || number < 0) {
throw "Not a valid number!";
}
The throw
statement is very similar to return
in that it ends the current function in which it is called. So, if we included more code below our throw
statement, it would not run:
if (isNaN(number) || number < 0) {
throw "Not a valid number!";
// this console.log is unreachable
console.log("Hello!");
}
However, throw
is different from the return
keyword in that control automatically switches to a catch
block, if there is one. If the program can't find a catch
, the program will simply terminate. So, if we intend to use the throw
keyword effectively, we should always use it with try...catch
. That's just what we do:
try {
checkNumber(inputtedNumber);
} catch(error) {
console.error(`Red alert! We have an error: ${error.message}`);
}
That's the basics of a try...catch
block. However, there's a few ways we can improve our code: we can turn our checkNumber()
function into a business logic function, and we can incorporate the JavaScript Error
object. In the process, we'll see another way that we can use a try...catch
, and learn about a new operator.
Let's do that next!
try...catch
with Separated Logic
For this next configuration, we'll only be updating our code in try.js
. Here's what the new code looks like:
// Business Logic
function checkNumber(number) {
if (isNaN(number) || number < 0) {
return new Error("Not a valid number!");
} else {
return true;
}
}
// User Interface Logic
window.addEventListener("load", function() {
document.querySelector('#submittedNumber').addEventListener("submit", function(event) {
event.preventDefault();
const inputtedNumber = parseInt(document.querySelector('#number').value);
document.querySelector('#number').value = null;
try {
const isNumberValid = checkNumber(inputtedNumber);
if (isNumberValid instanceof Error) {
console.error(isNumberValid.message);
throw RangeError("Not a valid number!");
} else {
console.log("Try was successful, so no need to catch!");
document.querySelector('#displayNumber').innerText = "This number is valid. You may continue.";
}
} catch(error) {
console.error(`Red alert! We have an error: ${error.message}`);
}
});
});
Now in our checkNumber()
function, if the number is NaN
or below 0, we return an Error
.
An Error
is a built-in JavaScript object. There are a number of different types of errors that we could specify; for instance, instead of creating a new Error
object, we could create a new RangeError
. In fact, a RangeError
would make more sense here because it's more specific. The documentation for JavaScript's Error
object states that a RangeError
represents "an error that occurs when a numeric variable or parameter is outside of its valid range", and that's exactly the case here. Later on in our try...catch
we incorporate a RangeError
.
Also notice that we pass a string value into the Error
object:
if (isNaN(number) || number < 0) {
return new Error("Not a valid number!");
}
We should always pass a value into any Error
objects we create. When the error is raised, we can see this value by looking at its message
property. Because errors can be very difficult to pinpoint in a larger application, the added detail is essential for debugging.
The next update we make is to our try...catch
block:
try {
const isNumberValid = checkNumber(inputtedNumber);
if (isNumberValid instanceof Error) {
console.error(isNumberValid.message);
throw RangeError("Not a valid number!");
} else {
console.log("Try was successful, so no need to catch!");
document.querySelector('#displayNumber').innerText = "This number is valid. You may continue.";
}
} catch(error) {
console.error(`Red alert! We have an error: ${error.message}`);
}
Now we save the result from calling the checkNumber()
function in the isNumberValid
variable, and we run that variable through a conditional. In our if
statement, we check to see if isNumberValid
is an instanceof Error
. If so, our application will throw a RangeError
.
We have a new JavaScript operator here: instanceof
. The instanceof
operator is specifically used to check the type of a JavaScript object. It does this by looking at the prototype chain of the object, which is a topic beyond the scope of this lesson.
We can test out instanceof
in the DevTools console:
> let error = new Error();
> let error2 = new RangeError();
> error instanceof Error;
true
> error2 instanceof Error;
true
Both of the last two expressions return true
. Note that while error2
is a RangeError
, this object type is also an Error
as well.
Also notice that we use console.error()
in our first if
statement:
try {
...
if (isNumberValid instanceof Error) {
console.error(isNumberValid.message);
throw RangeError("Not a valid number!");
}
} catch {
...
}
You may have stumbled across console.error
before, but if you haven't, it operates in a similar fashion to console.log
. The only difference is that the message is outlined in red. There's also console.warn
, which is generally used for notifications about deprecated functionality.
Inside our console.error
message, we log the error.message
. If we hadn't passed a string into our Error
object before, the message
property would be undefined
and we'd be depriving ourselves of useful information for debugging.
Next, we throw
a RangeError
to ensure that control moves to the catch
block. Keep in mind that throw
allows developers to define exceptions in an application.
For instance, JavaScript itself doesn't care if we call payBalance()
twice, charging our customers double in the process. To actually catch that behavior, we'd need to write and throw a custom exception.
Also keep in mind that if we throw
an error outside of a try...catch
block, the program will terminate. That's not really what we want, however. Instead, our application should be able to handle the error gracefully without terminating (unless it's absolutely necessary to terminate).
Our catch
block is the same as it was before:
try {
...
} catch(error) {
console.error(`Red alert! We have an error: ${error.message}`);
}
Take note that our catch
block could handle exceptions in a number of ways. The most obvious (and passive) is to log the error. However, since control has moved to the catch
block, we could technically run any code we want, including code that allows us to handle the error gracefully without terminating, like displaying a message to the user about the error.
Remember: Only Use try...catch
for Exceptional Errors
It's very simple to incorporate try...catch
blocks. In fact, it's easy enough that it can be very tempting to start using these blocks to handle many errors, including unexceptional ones. However, this is a mistake for a number of reasons. When developers see a try...catch
block, they will assume it's for handling serious exceptions. Using try...catch
blocks in other cases can be confusing. For instance, why would we use try...catch
for user input when validations are used for that exact purpose?
try...catch
can also result in a performance hit. While this usually won't be an issue, it's important to consider, particularly when an application has a long and resource-intensive stack trace that logs all of the function calls that led up to the error.
Just as importantly, our code would become both unreadable and very painful to write if we wrapped everything in a try...catch
block. Think about going through the scanner at the airport. You only need to do that once, when you're going into the terminal, not every time you go to the bathroom!
While the basics of exception handling are relatively easy, knowing when to use exception handling is a more advanced concept that comes with practice. As you build out classwork projects, consider situations where your application might have serious exceptions. You may find opportunities to practice using them even before we incorporate them in a future lesson.